Incidence of recall, nightmares, and hallucinations during analgosedation in intensive care

To define the incidence of recall and dreams during analgosedation in critically ill patients. Prospective clinical study. Anaesthesiological intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. Two hundred and eighty-nine critically ill patients, who either arrived intubated and sedated at the ICU o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive care medicine 2002-01, Vol.28 (1), p.38-43
Hauptverfasser: RUNDSHAGEN, I, SCHNABEL, K, WEGNER, C, ESCH, J. Schulte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To define the incidence of recall and dreams during analgosedation in critically ill patients. Prospective clinical study. Anaesthesiological intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. Two hundred and eighty-nine critically ill patients, who either arrived intubated and sedated at the ICU or required intubation, mechanical ventilation, and sedation during their ICU stay. none. The patients were interviewed 48-72 h after discharge from the ICU. By a structured interview they were asked whether they recalled any event before they had regained consciousness at the ICU. Moreover they were asked for dreams. Descriptive statistics: 64.7% of all patients did not recall any event, before they regained consciousness. However, 17% ( n=49) of all patients indicated that they remembered the tracheal tube or being on the ventilator, before they woke up. Some patients (21.1%) reported dreams or dreamlike sensations. Some patients (9.3%) recalled nightmares, while 6.6% reported hallucinations. Critically ill patients reported a high incidence of recall for unpleasant events, which they thought to have taken place before they regained consciousness. The patients, who stayed longer than 24 h at the ICU, indicated vivid memory for nightmares and hallucinations. Further studies are suggested to evaluate: 1) whether there is an impact of the present findings on outcome; and 2) whether clinical scores for sedation or neurophysiological monitoring help to define the exact time, when recall happens, in order to guide therapeutic intervention.
ISSN:0342-4642
1432-1238
DOI:10.1007/s00134-001-1168-3