Powerful Pharma and Its Marginalized Alternatives?: Effects of Individual Differences in Conspiracy Mentality on Attitudes Toward Medical Approaches
Only little is known about the underpinning psychological processes that determine medical choices. Across four studies, we establish that conspiracy mentality predicts a preference for alternative over biomedical therapies. Study 1a (N = 392) and 1b (N = 204) provide correlational support, Study 2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social psychology (Göttingen, Germany) Germany), 2018, Vol.49 (5), p.255-270 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Only little is known about the underpinning psychological
processes that determine medical choices. Across four studies, we establish that
conspiracy mentality predicts a preference for alternative over biomedical
therapies. Study 1a (N = 392) and 1b
(N = 204) provide correlational support,
Study 2 (N = 185) experimentally tested the role
of power: People who endorsed a conspiracy mentality perceived a drug more
positively if its approval was supported by a powerless (vs. powerful) agent.
Study 3 (N = 239) again showed a moderating
effect of power and conspiracy mentality on drug evaluation by comparing
analytic versus holistic approaches. These findings point to the consequences of
conspiracy mentality for health behavior and prevention programs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1864-9335 2151-2590 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1864-9335/a000347 |