Hermann-Broch-Handbuch ed. by Michael Kessler and Paul Michael Lützeler (review)
Based on anecdotal evidence, such as conversations with students and colleagues, I can report that the proliferation of author-handbooks in recent years is not uniformly praised. [...]I can attest that it was a valuable reading, which allowed me to refresh existing knowledge while identifying gaps a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | German studies review 2017-05, Vol.40 (2), p.469-471 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Based on anecdotal evidence, such as conversations with students and colleagues, I can report that the proliferation of author-handbooks in recent years is not uniformly praised. [...]I can attest that it was a valuable reading, which allowed me to refresh existing knowledge while identifying gaps and areas for possible future exploration. With this in mind, Broch-skeptics may want to start at the end of the handbook, with Gunther Martens's "Grundzüge, Schwerpunkte, Desiderate"; and those looking for systematic intellectual-historical and critical comparisons between Broch and his contemporaries are advised to refer to Thomas Borgard's essay on Broch's philosophical writings and Barbara Picht's on Broch's political writings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-7952 2164-8646 2164-8646 |
DOI: | 10.1353/gsr.2017.0082 |