Does discusson of possible scar rupture influence preferred mode of delivery after a caesarean section?

Using retrospective and prospective analyses of antenatal records, it was found that by 2003, discussions about the options for delivery after one lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) were almost always documented in antenatal notes, compared with only rare entries in 1993; specific mention of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005-05, Vol.25 (4), p.338
Hauptverfasser: Sur, Shyamaly, MacKenzie, I Z
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Using retrospective and prospective analyses of antenatal records, it was found that by 2003, discussions about the options for delivery after one lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) were almost always documented in antenatal notes, compared with only rare entries in 1993; specific mention of the risks of scar rupture were made in just under 50% in 2003. There was a considerable reduction in the proportion of women whose preference was to labour in 2003 compared with 1993 and also in the number who ultimately delivered vaginally. There was, however, no evidence that those women with whom possible scar rupture had been discussed were discouraged from attempting vaginal delivery. These data suggest that, contrary to expectations, increasing patients' involvement in their management in this situation does not result in fewer caesarean sections. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0144-3615
1364-6893