COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM PROPHYLAXIS IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKÆMIA
A retrospective comparison was made of three methods of central-nervous-system prophylaxis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukæmia; (1) intrathecal methotrexate only; (2) intermediate-dose methotrexate infusion and intrathecal methotrexate and; (3) 2400 rads cranial irradiation and intrathecal met...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 1980-06, Vol.315 (8183), p.1398-1402 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A retrospective comparison was made of three methods of central-nervous-system prophylaxis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukæmia; (1) intrathecal methotrexate only; (2) intermediate-dose methotrexate infusion and intrathecal methotrexate and; (3) 2400 rads cranial irradiation and intrathecal methotrexate. The incidence of primary meningeal relapse was statistically significantly lower in both standard-risk patients (age >24 months and ≤120 months white-cell count 120 months and/or white-cell count >20 000) whose central-nervous-system prophylaxis included cranial irradiation. The disease-free and overall survival of irradiated increased-risk patients was significantly better than that of unirradiated increased-risk patients. The disease-free survival of standard-risk patients who received intermediate-dose methotrexate was statistically superior to that of the remaining standard-risk patients. There were no significant differences in overall survival between the three groups of standard-risk patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(80)92664-1 |