COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM PROPHYLAXIS IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKÆMIA

A retrospective comparison was made of three methods of central-nervous-system prophylaxis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukæmia; (1) intrathecal methotrexate only; (2) intermediate-dose methotrexate infusion and intrathecal methotrexate and; (3) 2400 rads cranial irradiation and intrathecal met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1980-06, Vol.315 (8183), p.1398-1402
Hauptverfasser: Green, DanielM, Freeman, ArnoldI, Sather, HarlandN, Sallan, StephenE, Nesbit, MarkE, Cassady, J.Robert, Sinks, LuciusF, Hammond, Denman, Frei, Emil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A retrospective comparison was made of three methods of central-nervous-system prophylaxis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukæmia; (1) intrathecal methotrexate only; (2) intermediate-dose methotrexate infusion and intrathecal methotrexate and; (3) 2400 rads cranial irradiation and intrathecal methotrexate. The incidence of primary meningeal relapse was statistically significantly lower in both standard-risk patients (age >24 months and ≤120 months white-cell count 120 months and/or white-cell count >20 000) whose central-nervous-system prophylaxis included cranial irradiation. The disease-free and overall survival of irradiated increased-risk patients was significantly better than that of unirradiated increased-risk patients. The disease-free survival of standard-risk patients who received intermediate-dose methotrexate was statistically superior to that of the remaining standard-risk patients. There were no significant differences in overall survival between the three groups of standard-risk patients.
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(80)92664-1