RELATIVE EFFICACY OF BLOOD, URINE, RECTAL SWAB, BONE-MARROW, AND ROSE-SPOT CULTURES FOR RECOVERY OF SALMONELLA TYPHI IN TYPHOID FEVER

The recovery of Salmonella typhi from blood, rectal swab, urine, bone-marrow, and rose spots was compared in 62 patients with typhoid fever, most of whom had received some antibiotic therapy before presentation. S. typhi was isolated from culture of bone-marrow in 56 patients (90%); in contrast, S....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1975-05, Vol.305 (7918), p.1211-1213
Hauptverfasser: Gilman, RobertH, Terminel, Miguel, Levine, MyronM, Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo, Hornick, RichardB
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1213
container_issue 7918
container_start_page 1211
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 305
creator Gilman, RobertH
Terminel, Miguel
Levine, MyronM
Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo
Hornick, RichardB
description The recovery of Salmonella typhi from blood, rectal swab, urine, bone-marrow, and rose spots was compared in 62 patients with typhoid fever, most of whom had received some antibiotic therapy before presentation. S. typhi was isolated from culture of bone-marrow in 56 patients (90%); in contrast, S. typhi was recovered from blood in only 25 (40%), from stool in 23 (37%), and urine in 4 (7%). S. typhi was isolated from 24 (63%) of 38 patients who had rose-spot cultures. If culture sites had been limited to blood, stool, and urine, the bacteriological diagnosis would have been missed in 24 patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92194-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2155858945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673675921947</els_id><sourcerecordid>2155858945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-26b1e3c7eb21011804ad110da0da4b1e1a04f988a09bc73891b6a34b351ece043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUNFKwzAUDaLgnH6CEPBFYdVkTZr2SboudYVsGWm3uafQdhl06DbbTfAD_G-zTXwVLtwL95xz7zkA3GL0iBH2nlKECXI85nr3jD4EXRwQh52BFiaMOJSw13PQ-oNcgqumWSGEiIdoC3wrLsIsmXLI4ziJwmgOZQx7Qsp-B05UMuIdqHiUhQKms7DXgT054s4wVErOOjAc9aGSKXfSscxgNBHZRPEUxlIdSHLK1VEuDcXQ0oQIYTYfDxKYjI6DTPow5hZ1DS6W-Vtjbn57G0xinkUDR8gX-5RwShd7O6frFdi4JTNF1xrHPiL5AmO0yG0Ru8I5IsvA93MUFCVz_QAXXu6SwqXYlAYRtw3uTrrbevOxN81Orzb7em1P6i6m1Kd-QKhF0ROqrDdNU5ul3tbVe15_aYz0IXF9TFwf4tSM6mPimlne84lnrIXPytS6KSuzLs2iqk2504tN9Y_CDxcxfDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155858945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RELATIVE EFFICACY OF BLOOD, URINE, RECTAL SWAB, BONE-MARROW, AND ROSE-SPOT CULTURES FOR RECOVERY OF SALMONELLA TYPHI IN TYPHOID FEVER</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gilman, RobertH ; Terminel, Miguel ; Levine, MyronM ; Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo ; Hornick, RichardB</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilman, RobertH ; Terminel, Miguel ; Levine, MyronM ; Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo ; Hornick, RichardB</creatorcontrib><description>The recovery of Salmonella typhi from blood, rectal swab, urine, bone-marrow, and rose spots was compared in 62 patients with typhoid fever, most of whom had received some antibiotic therapy before presentation. S. typhi was isolated from culture of bone-marrow in 56 patients (90%); in contrast, S. typhi was recovered from blood in only 25 (40%), from stool in 23 (37%), and urine in 4 (7%). S. typhi was isolated from 24 (63%) of 38 patients who had rose-spot cultures. If culture sites had been limited to blood, stool, and urine, the bacteriological diagnosis would have been missed in 24 patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92194-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Blood ; Bone marrow ; Fever ; Patients ; Recovery ; Recovery (Medical) ; Rectum ; Salmonella ; Typhoid ; Urine ; Vaccines ; Waterborne diseases</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1975-05, Vol.305 (7918), p.1211-1213</ispartof><rights>1975</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 31, 1975</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-26b1e3c7eb21011804ad110da0da4b1e1a04f988a09bc73891b6a34b351ece043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-26b1e3c7eb21011804ad110da0da4b1e1a04f988a09bc73891b6a34b351ece043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92194-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilman, RobertH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terminel, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, MyronM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornick, RichardB</creatorcontrib><title>RELATIVE EFFICACY OF BLOOD, URINE, RECTAL SWAB, BONE-MARROW, AND ROSE-SPOT CULTURES FOR RECOVERY OF SALMONELLA TYPHI IN TYPHOID FEVER</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>The recovery of Salmonella typhi from blood, rectal swab, urine, bone-marrow, and rose spots was compared in 62 patients with typhoid fever, most of whom had received some antibiotic therapy before presentation. S. typhi was isolated from culture of bone-marrow in 56 patients (90%); in contrast, S. typhi was recovered from blood in only 25 (40%), from stool in 23 (37%), and urine in 4 (7%). S. typhi was isolated from 24 (63%) of 38 patients who had rose-spot cultures. If culture sites had been limited to blood, stool, and urine, the bacteriological diagnosis would have been missed in 24 patients.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Typhoid</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Waterborne diseases</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUNFKwzAUDaLgnH6CEPBFYdVkTZr2SboudYVsGWm3uafQdhl06DbbTfAD_G-zTXwVLtwL95xz7zkA3GL0iBH2nlKECXI85nr3jD4EXRwQh52BFiaMOJSw13PQ-oNcgqumWSGEiIdoC3wrLsIsmXLI4ziJwmgOZQx7Qsp-B05UMuIdqHiUhQKms7DXgT054s4wVErOOjAc9aGSKXfSscxgNBHZRPEUxlIdSHLK1VEuDcXQ0oQIYTYfDxKYjI6DTPow5hZ1DS6W-Vtjbn57G0xinkUDR8gX-5RwShd7O6frFdi4JTNF1xrHPiL5AmO0yG0Ru8I5IsvA93MUFCVz_QAXXu6SwqXYlAYRtw3uTrrbevOxN81Orzb7em1P6i6m1Kd-QKhF0ROqrDdNU5ul3tbVe15_aYz0IXF9TFwf4tSM6mPimlne84lnrIXPytS6KSuzLs2iqk2504tN9Y_CDxcxfDM</recordid><startdate>19750531</startdate><enddate>19750531</enddate><creator>Gilman, RobertH</creator><creator>Terminel, Miguel</creator><creator>Levine, MyronM</creator><creator>Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo</creator><creator>Hornick, RichardB</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19750531</creationdate><title>RELATIVE EFFICACY OF BLOOD, URINE, RECTAL SWAB, BONE-MARROW, AND ROSE-SPOT CULTURES FOR RECOVERY OF SALMONELLA TYPHI IN TYPHOID FEVER</title><author>Gilman, RobertH ; Terminel, Miguel ; Levine, MyronM ; Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo ; Hornick, RichardB</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-26b1e3c7eb21011804ad110da0da4b1e1a04f988a09bc73891b6a34b351ece043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Typhoid</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Waterborne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilman, RobertH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terminel, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, MyronM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornick, RichardB</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilman, RobertH</au><au>Terminel, Miguel</au><au>Levine, MyronM</au><au>Hernandez-Mendoza, Pablo</au><au>Hornick, RichardB</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RELATIVE EFFICACY OF BLOOD, URINE, RECTAL SWAB, BONE-MARROW, AND ROSE-SPOT CULTURES FOR RECOVERY OF SALMONELLA TYPHI IN TYPHOID FEVER</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>1975-05-31</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>305</volume><issue>7918</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1213</epage><pages>1211-1213</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>The recovery of Salmonella typhi from blood, rectal swab, urine, bone-marrow, and rose spots was compared in 62 patients with typhoid fever, most of whom had received some antibiotic therapy before presentation. S. typhi was isolated from culture of bone-marrow in 56 patients (90%); in contrast, S. typhi was recovered from blood in only 25 (40%), from stool in 23 (37%), and urine in 4 (7%). S. typhi was isolated from 24 (63%) of 38 patients who had rose-spot cultures. If culture sites had been limited to blood, stool, and urine, the bacteriological diagnosis would have been missed in 24 patients.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92194-7</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 1975-05, Vol.305 (7918), p.1211-1213
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2155858945
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Antibiotics
Blood
Bone marrow
Fever
Patients
Recovery
Recovery (Medical)
Rectum
Salmonella
Typhoid
Urine
Vaccines
Waterborne diseases
title RELATIVE EFFICACY OF BLOOD, URINE, RECTAL SWAB, BONE-MARROW, AND ROSE-SPOT CULTURES FOR RECOVERY OF SALMONELLA TYPHI IN TYPHOID FEVER
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A42%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RELATIVE%20EFFICACY%20OF%20BLOOD,%20URINE,%20RECTAL%20SWAB,%20BONE-MARROW,%20AND%20ROSE-SPOT%20CULTURES%20FOR%20RECOVERY%20OF%20SALMONELLA%20TYPHI%20IN%20TYPHOID%20FEVER&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Gilman,%20RobertH&rft.date=1975-05-31&rft.volume=305&rft.issue=7918&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1213&rft.pages=1211-1213&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92194-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2155858945%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155858945&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673675921947&rfr_iscdi=true