Assessing Quasi‐Periodicities in Jovian X‐Ray Emissions: Techniques and Heritage Survey

Jupiter's auroral X‐rays are rather mysterious, with an unknown driver, and several previous reports of individual cases of quasi‐periodic emission. In this work we revisit heritage X‐ray data sets from the 1990s to 2015 and apply robust significance testing of emerging quasi‐periodicities, see...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2018-11, Vol.123 (11), p.9204-9221
Hauptverfasser: Jackman, C. M., Knigge, C., Altamirano, D., Gladstone, R., Dunn, W., Elsner, R., Kraft, R., Branduardi‐Raymont, G., Ford, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Jupiter's auroral X‐rays are rather mysterious, with an unknown driver, and several previous reports of individual cases of quasi‐periodic emission. In this work we revisit heritage X‐ray data sets from the 1990s to 2015 and apply robust significance testing of emerging quasi‐periodicities, seeking to understand the robustness and regularity of previously reported quasi‐periodic emissions. Our analysis incorporates the use of the Rayleigh test as an alternative to Lomb‐Scargle analysis or Fast Fourier Transforms, where Rayleigh is particularly suited to a time‐tagged data set of sparse counts such as is common for jovian X‐ray data. Furthermore, the analysis techniques that we present (including Rayleigh testing and Monte Carlo simulation) can be applied to any time‐tagged data set. The code to conduct such analysis is released as supplementary information to accompany this paper. The five most significant (p value
ISSN:2169-9380
2169-9402
DOI:10.1029/2018JA025490