Calcium-Creatinine Clearance Ratio is not Helpful in Differentiating Primary Hyperparathyroidism from Familial Hypercalcemic Hypocalciuria: A Study of 1,000 Patients

Objective: With increasing recognition of more subtle presentations of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), laboratory values are frequently seen in a range that would be expected for patients who have familial hypercalcemic hypocalciuria (FHH). Calcium-creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR) has been advo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine practice 2018-11, Vol.24 (11), p.988-994
Hauptverfasser: Moore, Edwina C., Berber, Eren, Jin, Judy, Krishnamurthy, Vikram, Shin, Joyce, Siperstein, Allan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: With increasing recognition of more subtle presentations of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), laboratory values are frequently seen in a range that would be expected for patients who have familial hypercalcemic hypocalciuria (FHH). Calcium-creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR) has been advocated as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between these two disorders. However, it is limited by an indeterminate range (0.01 to 0.02). The aim of this study was to assess the relevance of CCCR in a modern series of patients with surgically managed pHPT.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1,000 patients who underwent parathyroid surgery for pHPT over 11 years. CCCR was evaluated by degree of biochemical derangement, single versus multiple gland disease, and interfering medications.Results: Patient demographics and resected histopathology were typical for a current series of patients with pHPT. In retrospect, none of the patients were suspected to have FHH postoperatively. CCCR was 0.02 in 37.3%. Distribution of CCCR for patients free from interfering medications and different histologic subtypes were the same. One-third of the cohort had mild calcium elevations, more typical for FHH. Of these, almost two-thirds had a CCCR in a range suspect for FHH (
ISSN:1530-891X
1934-2403
DOI:10.4158/EP-2018-0350