Epigrams and Political Satire in Early Stuart England

The Renaissance epigram was distinguished from satire by its brevity and sharpness, features that influenced how the form was used for political commentary. Its classical legacy promised an elite status and authorial control, but its brevity and wit encouraged widespread oral, manuscript, and print...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Huntington Library quarterly 2006-03, Vol.69 (1), p.31-46
1. Verfasser: Doelman, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Renaissance epigram was distinguished from satire by its brevity and sharpness, features that influenced how the form was used for political commentary. Its classical legacy promised an elite status and authorial control, but its brevity and wit encouraged widespread oral, manuscript, and print circulation, and epigrammatists therefore struggled to distinguish their work from various popular forms, such as the ballad. The sub-genre of the epitaph was often used for satiric purposes, and examples prompted by the death of the epigrammatist John Owen provide a case study in the dynamics of poetic and political exchange.
ISSN:0018-7895
1544-399X
DOI:10.1525/hlq.2006.69.1.31