A Comparison of Centralization/Decentralization of Decision-Making Concepts and Measures
Despite the importance of understanding centralization/decentralization (C/D) in organizational theory, accumulated research findings indicate that more attention is warranted in specifying the conceptualization of the construct. Three perspectives have guided research efforts: 1. hierarchical, 2. c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management 1984-07, Vol.10 (2), p.259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Despite the importance of understanding centralization/decentralization (C/D) in organizational theory, accumulated research findings indicate that more attention is warranted in specifying the conceptualization of the construct. Three perspectives have guided research efforts: 1. hierarchical, 2. concentration, and 3. participation. The assumption that C/D is unidimensional is explored in order to refine further the conceptualization and measurement of C/D. Three new measures representing concentration and participation conceptualizations of C/D are compared to the most commonly employed hierarchical C/D indicator. The 3 new measures, as well as the traditional hierarchical approach, are compared across 3 topical decision areas. Two of the 4 measures are found to be subject-matter specific even when the same measurement approach was applied. This implies that different structures of decision making exist simultaneously in the organization along 2 dimensions: 1. the type of decision, and 2. the type of C/D. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-2063 1557-1211 |
DOI: | 10.1177/014920638401000211 |