Comment on intense shock waves in monatomic gases
It is known that the wavefront of a shock wave in a shock tube becomes unstable at particular Mach numbers and unperturbed gas pressure. This instability leads to the distortion of the wave front, i.e. particular Mach numbers define a threshold beyond which the wavefront is no longer plane (see Anno...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plasma physics 2001-07, Vol.66 (1-2), p.135-139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is known that the wavefront of a shock wave in a shock tube becomes unstable at
particular Mach numbers and unperturbed gas pressure. This instability leads to the
distortion of the wave front, i.e. particular Mach numbers define a threshold beyond
which the wavefront is no longer plane (see Annou and Ferhat 1997, and references
therein). In a recent paper (Annou and Ferhat 1997, subsequently referred to as
AF), the authors proposed a microscopic model based on an ionization mechanism
described by a set of two reaction–diffusion equations in an effort to interpret
the wavefront distortion. Using an analytical approach, they argued that their
equations have a bifurcation point beyond which the wavefront instability occurs
and that the solution thus obtained describes the distortion of the wavefront. In
this brief comment, we present analytical and numerical arguments supporting the
fact that the proposed model, although it has an instability point, is unable to
explain the front behavior. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3778 1469-7807 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0022377801001192 |