Taste overshadows less salient cues to elicit food aversion in endangered marsupial

•We address conditioned taste aversion as a conservation tool for northern quolls.•We show that quolls associate natural (meat) stimuli with an aversion.•Natural stimuli overshadow less salient artificial olfactory and visual cues.•Conditioned taste aversion can be used in quolls to stop them attack...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied animal behaviour science 2018-12, Vol.209, p.83-87
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Ella, Phillips, Ben L., Webb, Jonathan K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We address conditioned taste aversion as a conservation tool for northern quolls.•We show that quolls associate natural (meat) stimuli with an aversion.•Natural stimuli overshadow less salient artificial olfactory and visual cues.•Conditioned taste aversion can be used in quolls to stop them attacking toxic prey. Conditioned taste aversion is an emerging conservation tool that can be used to limit inter-species conflict, for example decreasing predation on endangered species, or limiting the consumption of invasive toxic prey. Typically, managers wish to elicit an aversion that will be associated with visual or odour cues so that the target species maintains an “arm’s length” relationship, and does not have to attack or taste the prey. Combining multiple cues in conditioned taste aversion can cause cue overshadowing, so reducing the effectiveness of the training. Here, we examine the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus), a carnivorous marsupial threatened because they attack the toxic invasive cane toad (Rhinella marina). Conditioned taste aversion has been suggested as a way to reduce quoll’s predation on toads, but for training to be effective it must elicit an aversion to stimuli before the quolls attack the toad. Using baits containing distinct novel meat, odour and visual cues, we test whether quolls will generalise their aversion to visual or odour cues. We found that quolls associate their aversion with the compound stimulus of meat taste and meat odour, and that this overshadows the less salient artificial odour and visual cues. Quolls ate 87% of taste cue substituted baits, compared to 38% and 42% of the odour and visual cue substituted baits respectively, which represented a significant interaction between bait type and substituted cue (χ2(4) = 14.70, p = 0.005). We show that although quolls do not generalise their aversions to novel artificial stimuli, they can distinguish subtle visual and odour cues in meat that still elicit an aversion without them needing to attack and taste prey.
ISSN:0168-1591
1872-9045
DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2018.09.003