Is high active share always good?

More and more asset managers are committing to an explicit active share target, which takes the form of a lower bound (e.g. at least 75%) or a range of values (e.g. between 75 and 85%). The active share target is used either in conjunction with, or as a substitute for a tracking error limit. We anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of asset management 2018-12, Vol.19 (7), p.460-471
Hauptverfasser: De Rossi, Giuliano, Brar, Gurvinder
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:More and more asset managers are committing to an explicit active share target, which takes the form of a lower bound (e.g. at least 75%) or a range of values (e.g. between 75 and 85%). The active share target is used either in conjunction with, or as a substitute for a tracking error limit. We analyse the implications of active share targets on the portfolio construction process using a simple optimisation framework. Our results suggest, counter to conventional wisdom, that in certain situations the portfolio construction process benefits from imposing a limit on active share rather than from boosting active share. In particular, if the signal used in a strategy is weak, then a constraint on active share can help mitigate the effects of model uncertainty.
ISSN:1470-8272
1479-179X
DOI:10.1057/s41260-018-0096-5