Is high active share always good?
More and more asset managers are committing to an explicit active share target, which takes the form of a lower bound (e.g. at least 75%) or a range of values (e.g. between 75 and 85%). The active share target is used either in conjunction with, or as a substitute for a tracking error limit. We anal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of asset management 2018-12, Vol.19 (7), p.460-471 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | More and more asset managers are committing to an explicit active share target, which takes the form of a lower bound (e.g. at least 75%) or a range of values (e.g. between 75 and 85%). The active share target is used either in conjunction with, or as a substitute for a tracking error limit. We analyse the implications of active share targets on the portfolio construction process using a simple optimisation framework. Our results suggest, counter to conventional wisdom, that in certain situations the portfolio construction process benefits from imposing
a limit
on active share rather than from boosting active share. In particular, if the signal used in a strategy is weak, then a constraint on active share can help mitigate the effects of model uncertainty. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-8272 1479-179X |
DOI: | 10.1057/s41260-018-0096-5 |