RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN A SALVAGE SETTING: RESULTS OF A CONTEMPORARY MULTICENTRE SERIES OF 395 CASES
Background/Aim: Men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment benefit from salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) as a valid curative choice. However, present evidence rests on series of patients operated more than 50 years ago. In this study, oncological outcomes of a wide contemporary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anticancer research 2018-04, Vol.38 (4), p.2565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background/Aim: Men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment benefit from salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) as a valid curative choice. However, present evidence rests on series of patients operated more than 50 years ago. In this study, oncological outcomes of a wide contemporary series of sRP are examined. Materials and Methods: From 2000 to 2016, in a multicenter study of 18 tertiary referral centers, 615 patients with BCR underwent sRP. We retrospectively collected pre-, intra- and post- procedural clinical and pathological data. Information about erectile function (EF) and urinary continence (Con) was detected before sRP, at 6 and/or at 12 months. No men with a follow-up |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0250-7005 1791-7530 |