Reply to Comment by Zhang et al. on the Paper “Long‐Term Variations of Exospheric Temperature Inferred From foF1 Observations: A Comparison to ISR Ti Trend Estimates” by Perrone and Mikhailov

The majority of Zhang et al. critical comments concern our method to retrieve aeronomic parameters from ionosonde foF1 observations. The main idea of the method was described by Mikhailov and Perrone (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022716), but it is seen that an additional clarification is req...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.8895-8907
Hauptverfasser: Perrone, L., Mikhailov, A. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The majority of Zhang et al. critical comments concern our method to retrieve aeronomic parameters from ionosonde foF1 observations. The main idea of the method was described by Mikhailov and Perrone (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022716), but it is seen that an additional clarification is required. The method has been slightly changed to meet numerous comments of referees, and its description is given here. The comments by Zhang et al. are analyzed and answered. Key Points An improved method to extract a self‐consistent set of seven aeronomic parameters responsible for the midlatitude F1 region formation is presented Mean ion mass inferred from foF1 observations manifests negative trends that should correspond to Tn negative trend contrary to ISR results Routine ISR method based on a fixed model of ion composition (crucial for the method) should inevitably result in wrong Tn long‐term trends
ISSN:2169-9380
2169-9402
DOI:10.1029/2017JA025039