Reply to Comment by Zhang et al. on the Paper “Long‐Term Variations of Exospheric Temperature Inferred From foF1 Observations: A Comparison to ISR Ti Trend Estimates” by Perrone and Mikhailov
The majority of Zhang et al. critical comments concern our method to retrieve aeronomic parameters from ionosonde foF1 observations. The main idea of the method was described by Mikhailov and Perrone (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022716), but it is seen that an additional clarification is req...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.8895-8907 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The majority of Zhang et al. critical comments concern our method to retrieve aeronomic parameters from ionosonde foF1 observations. The main idea of the method was described by Mikhailov and Perrone (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022716), but it is seen that an additional clarification is required. The method has been slightly changed to meet numerous comments of referees, and its description is given here. The comments by Zhang et al. are analyzed and answered.
Key Points
An improved method to extract a self‐consistent set of seven aeronomic parameters responsible for the midlatitude F1 region formation is presented
Mean ion mass inferred from foF1 observations manifests negative trends that should correspond to Tn negative trend contrary to ISR results
Routine ISR method based on a fixed model of ion composition (crucial for the method) should inevitably result in wrong Tn long‐term trends |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-9380 2169-9402 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2017JA025039 |