Biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Improving chemotherapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will require the development of new strategies to better use currently available agents. To assess the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2006-08, Vol.58 (2), p.266-271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Improving chemotherapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will require the development of new strategies to better use currently available agents. To assess the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Patients with selected stage IIIb (pleural effusion)/stage IV NSCLC, performance status of 0-2 and normal organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 every 28 days.
Of the 40 patients enrolled and assessable for response, there were five (12.5%) with confirmed complete response and 14 (35%) with a confirmed partial response for an overall response rate of 47.5%. Nine patients had stable disease while 12 (30%) progressed. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients were 6.3 and 11.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was principally hematologic, with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 30%, and grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting in 22.5%. There were no treatment-related deaths.
The biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine is associated with a high rate of response, lesser toxicity than other three-drug regimens and no benefit of survival. Therefore, the regimen under study may be an appealing alternative when considering other treatment modalities for advanced lung cancer, such as neoadjuvant therapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0344-5704 1432-0843 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00280-005-0143-z |