Biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Improving chemotherapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will require the development of new strategies to better use currently available agents. To assess the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2006-08, Vol.58 (2), p.266-271
Hauptverfasser: DE CARPENO, Javier Castro, GONZALEZ BARON, M, AGUIAR, J, CHACON, J. I, FELIU, J, GARCIA, M. J, MADRONAL, C, COLMENAREJO, A, SANCHEZ, J. J, ORDONEZ, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Improving chemotherapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will require the development of new strategies to better use currently available agents. To assess the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with selected stage IIIb (pleural effusion)/stage IV NSCLC, performance status of 0-2 and normal organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. Of the 40 patients enrolled and assessable for response, there were five (12.5%) with confirmed complete response and 14 (35%) with a confirmed partial response for an overall response rate of 47.5%. Nine patients had stable disease while 12 (30%) progressed. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients were 6.3 and 11.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was principally hematologic, with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 30%, and grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting in 22.5%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine is associated with a high rate of response, lesser toxicity than other three-drug regimens and no benefit of survival. Therefore, the regimen under study may be an appealing alternative when considering other treatment modalities for advanced lung cancer, such as neoadjuvant therapy.
ISSN:0344-5704
1432-0843
DOI:10.1007/s00280-005-0143-z