The Agricultural Wheel, the Union Labor Party, and the 1889 Arkansas Legislature

In Populist historiography, Peter Argersinger argues, scholars continue to comb the same newspapers and manuscript collections, in the belief that . . . . 'we have no other sources.' While some scholars have utilized quantitative analysis to get at popular voting behavior or to characteriz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Arkansas historical quarterly 2009-07, Vol.68 (2), p.157-175
1. Verfasser: McCollom, Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In Populist historiography, Peter Argersinger argues, scholars continue to comb the same newspapers and manuscript collections, in the belief that . . . . 'we have no other sources.' While some scholars have utilized quantitative analysis to get at popular voting behavior or to characterize the constituency of Populists and other insurgents of the late nineteenth century, little effort has gone into examining what legislative journals can tell us about third-party politics, even though Allan Bogue termed such material the largest body of opinion data, systematically collected and organized, that American society has preserved. [...] parties rarely held a majority or controlled the legislature, and their majorparty counterparts prevented equal access to the electorate by ensuring that their own party was given preferential treatment on the ballot and in the voting process.
ISSN:0004-1823
2327-1213