Further evidence on corporate bonds with event-risk convenants: Inference from Standard and Poor's and Moody's bond ratings
A study considers potential differences in the appraisal of event-risk covenants by the 2 rating agencies, S&P and Moody's. While S&P supplements its traditional bond ratings with event-risk covenant rankings, Moody's incorporates its judgment of these covenants directly into its b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Quarterly review of economics and finance 1997-10, Vol.37 (3), p.709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A study considers potential differences in the appraisal of event-risk covenants by the 2 rating agencies, S&P and Moody's. While S&P supplements its traditional bond ratings with event-risk covenant rankings, Moody's incorporates its judgment of these covenants directly into its bond ratings. The results show that, on average, Moody's rates bonds with even-risk covenants higher than S the difference, however, is not statistically significant. Regression analysis shows that the S&P event-risk rankings are significantly, positively related to bond yield spreads, indicating that the market values event-risk covenants and that greater yield spreads are associated with lower even-risk protection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1062-9769 |