How to Make Scientists Agree: An Evolutionary Betting Mechanism
One of the basic problems in giving economic advice is to find sufficiently robust empirical evidence for making policy recommendations. Since there are no "objective" ways to decide on the "truth" of scientific results, social sciences have resorted to some method of "tempo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kyklos (Basel) 2000-01, Vol.53 (4), p.587-592 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One of the basic problems in giving economic advice is to find sufficiently robust empirical evidence for making policy recommendations. Since there are no "objective" ways to decide on the "truth" of scientific results, social sciences have resorted to some method of "temporary consensus," which has lead to various schools of thought involving scholars that agree upon certain views, assumptions and methods. Slembeck outlines a basic mechanism that may help to bridge some of the disagreement between schools. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0023-5962 1467-6435 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1467-6435.00135 |