Auxetic structure for increased power output of strain vibration energy harvester

•An auxetic substrate increases power output of a piezoelectric element.•This substrate increases the stress in the element both axially and laterally.•A power gain of up to 14.4 times a plain harvester was observed experimentally. This paper develops an auxetic (negative Poisson’s ratio) piezoelect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sensors and actuators. A. Physical. 2018-10, Vol.282, p.90-96
Hauptverfasser: Ferguson, William J.G., Kuang, Yang, Evans, Kenneth E., Smith, Christopher W., Zhu, Meiling
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•An auxetic substrate increases power output of a piezoelectric element.•This substrate increases the stress in the element both axially and laterally.•A power gain of up to 14.4 times a plain harvester was observed experimentally. This paper develops an auxetic (negative Poisson’s ratio) piezoelectric energy harvester (APEH) to increase the power output when harnessing strain energy. The APEH consists of a piezoelectric element bonded to an auxetic substrate. The auxetic substrate concentrates the applied stress and strain into the region of the piezoelectric element and introduces auxetic behaviour in the piezoelectric element, both of which increase the electric power output. A finite element model was developed to optimise the design and verify the mechanism of the power increase. Three APEHs were manufactured and characterised. Their performance was compared with two equivalent strain energy harvesters with plain substrates. Experimental results show that the APEHs, excited by sinusoidal strains of 250 με peak-to-peak at 10 Hz, are able to produce electric power of up to 191.1 μW, which is 14.4 times that of the peak power produced by the plain harvesters (13.4 μW). The power gain factor is constant between samples as the amplitude and frequency of their applied strains are varied. The model and experimental results are in good agreement, once accounting for the imperfect bonding of the epoxy using the spring constant of the Thin Elastic Layers on the modelled epoxy surfaces.
ISSN:0924-4247
1873-3069
DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.019