Measuring the influence of discharge energy on white layer thickness in electrical discharge machining process

[Display omitted] •Due to uniform energy distribution, iso current produced low AVLT.•Vi has most dominating nature in EDM process.•The Duty factor has considerably contributed on the surface roughness. In electrical discharge machining, the performance measures are mainly influenced by the discharg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2019-01, Vol.131, p.694-700
1. Verfasser: Muthuramalingam, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Due to uniform energy distribution, iso current produced low AVLT.•Vi has most dominating nature in EDM process.•The Duty factor has considerably contributed on the surface roughness. In electrical discharge machining, the performance measures are mainly influenced by the discharge energy developed during the machining process. Owing to its higher strength, stainless steel can be easily machined by electrical discharge machining under the presence of dielectric medium. Since the surface quality of high strength workpiece is influenced by white layer formation, it is very essential to analyze the effects of discharge energy distribution and process parameters on white layer formation in machining process. In the present study, an endeavor has been attempted to analyze the influence of a modified pulse energy generator system on performance measures. From the experimental results, it has been observed iso energy pulse generator has created thinner and more symmetrical white layer thickness on the machined workpiece owing to its ability to produce lower discharge energy pulses with nearly uniform energy distribution. Peak current has been observed as significant factor on determining white layer formation in the EDM process.
ISSN:0263-2241
1873-412X
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.038