Total Dust and Endotoxin in Poultry Operations: Comparison Between Cage and Floor Housing and Respiratory Effects in Workers

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess respiratory outcomes and environmental exposure levels of workers in cage-housed and floorhoused poultry operations. Methods: Poultry operations were evaluated for total dust, endotoxin, and ammonia, and respiratory symptoms and lung function test...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2006-07, Vol.48 (7), p.741-748
Hauptverfasser: Kirychuk, S. P., Dosman, J. A., Reynolds, S. J., Willson, P., Senthilselvan, A., Feddes, J. J. R., Classen, H. L., Guenter, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The objective of this study was to assess respiratory outcomes and environmental exposure levels of workers in cage-housed and floorhoused poultry operations. Methods: Poultry operations were evaluated for total dust, endotoxin, and ammonia, and respiratory symptoms and lung function tests of workers were conducted. Results: Workers in floor-housed poultry operations had significantly greater exposures to total dust and ammonia, whereas workers from cage-housed poultry operations reported greaterfrequency of current and chronic symptoms overall and significantly greater current and chronic phhgm (39% vs 18% and 40% vs 11%, respectively), Endotoxin concentration (EU/mg) was a significant predictor (P = 0.05) of chronic phlegm for all poultry workers. Conclusions: Greater endotoxin concentration in the presence of significantly lower total dust, in conjunction with greater respiratory symptoms in workers from cage-housed poultry operations, as compared with workers from floor-housed poultry operations, appears to indicate that differences in environmental exposures may impact respiratory outcomes of workers.
ISSN:1076-2752
1536-5948
DOI:10.1097/01.jom.0000216215.39521.3c