Investigating the Efficacy of Interactive Ethics Education: A Difference in Pedagogical Emphasis
This study employs an experimental design to investigate the efficacy of a new approach to ethics training- "interactive" ethics education. After random assignment to groups of 135 real estate licensees from four different firms, the treatment group received specialized, interactive ethics...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of marketing theory and practice 2006-06, Vol.14 (3), p.239-248 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 248 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | Journal of marketing theory and practice |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Izzo, G. Martin Langford, Barry E. Vitell, Scott |
description | This study employs an experimental design to investigate the efficacy of a new approach to ethics training- "interactive" ethics education. After random assignment to groups of 135 real estate licensees from four different firms, the treatment group received specialized, interactive ethics instruction, while the control group did not. The two groups were tested in terms of both their general level of cognitive moral development using Rest's defining issues test (DIT) and their industry-specific level of moral development using the real estate survey (RES). Although a pretest indicated that there was no significant difference in levels of cognitive moral development between the control and treatment groups, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of both DIT and RES after the completion of the interactive training session. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2753/MTP1069-6679140305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212188343</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40470268</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40470268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b452d0bc95c33384b04d6d5be525c8ecb6a81f712e1ade2f540fedcd74759ee13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLQzEQhS-iYH38AUEI7q_meR-Ci1KvWqjoQtcxN482pU1qklb6743Ux87VDHPON8OcojhD8BLXjFw9vjwjWLVlVdUtopBAtlcMUEtpWaOa7ef-Rz0sjmKcQwhJ08BB8TZ2Gx2TnYpk3RSkmQadMVYKuQXegLFLOgiZ7CbP08zKCDq1ltns3TUYgltrjA7aSQ2sA89aiamfZnoBuuVqJqKNJ8WBEYuoT7_rcfF6172MHsrJ0_14NJyUkjCYyp4yrGAvWyYJIQ3tIVWVYr1mmMlGy74SDTI1whoJpbFhFBqtpKppzVqtETkuLnZ7V8G_r_NLfO7XweWTHCOMmoZQkk14Z5LBxxi04atglyJsOYL8K0j-HST_CzJD5ztoHpMPvwSFtIa4arJ-s9OtMz4sxYcPC8WT2C58MEE4aSMn_-z_BButhBs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212188343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the Efficacy of Interactive Ethics Education: A Difference in Pedagogical Emphasis</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Izzo, G. Martin ; Langford, Barry E. ; Vitell, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Izzo, G. Martin ; Langford, Barry E. ; Vitell, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>This study employs an experimental design to investigate the efficacy of a new approach to ethics training- "interactive" ethics education. After random assignment to groups of 135 real estate licensees from four different firms, the treatment group received specialized, interactive ethics instruction, while the control group did not. The two groups were tested in terms of both their general level of cognitive moral development using Rest's defining issues test (DIT) and their industry-specific level of moral development using the real estate survey (RES). Although a pretest indicated that there was no significant difference in levels of cognitive moral development between the control and treatment groups, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of both DIT and RES after the completion of the interactive training session.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-6679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679140305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive style ; Control groups ; Decision making ; Descriptive ethics ; Design ; Education ; Ethical instruction ; Ethics ; Experiments ; Interactive learning ; Kohlbergs stages of moral development ; Marketing ; Moral development ; Moral education ; Morality ; Pedagogy ; Real estate ; Real estate sales ; Social ethics ; Students ; Training ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing theory and practice, 2006-06, Vol.14 (3), p.239-248</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 M.E.Sharpe, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright M. E. Sharpe Inc. Summer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b452d0bc95c33384b04d6d5be525c8ecb6a81f712e1ade2f540fedcd74759ee13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b452d0bc95c33384b04d6d5be525c8ecb6a81f712e1ade2f540fedcd74759ee13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40470268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40470268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Izzo, G. Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langford, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitell, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the Efficacy of Interactive Ethics Education: A Difference in Pedagogical Emphasis</title><title>Journal of marketing theory and practice</title><description>This study employs an experimental design to investigate the efficacy of a new approach to ethics training- "interactive" ethics education. After random assignment to groups of 135 real estate licensees from four different firms, the treatment group received specialized, interactive ethics instruction, while the control group did not. The two groups were tested in terms of both their general level of cognitive moral development using Rest's defining issues test (DIT) and their industry-specific level of moral development using the real estate survey (RES). Although a pretest indicated that there was no significant difference in levels of cognitive moral development between the control and treatment groups, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of both DIT and RES after the completion of the interactive training session.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Descriptive ethics</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethical instruction</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Interactive learning</subject><subject>Kohlbergs stages of moral development</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Moral development</subject><subject>Moral education</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1069-6679</issn><issn>1944-7175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLQzEQhS-iYH38AUEI7q_meR-Ci1KvWqjoQtcxN482pU1qklb6743Ux87VDHPON8OcojhD8BLXjFw9vjwjWLVlVdUtopBAtlcMUEtpWaOa7ef-Rz0sjmKcQwhJ08BB8TZ2Gx2TnYpk3RSkmQadMVYKuQXegLFLOgiZ7CbP08zKCDq1ltns3TUYgltrjA7aSQ2sA89aiamfZnoBuuVqJqKNJ8WBEYuoT7_rcfF6172MHsrJ0_14NJyUkjCYyp4yrGAvWyYJIQ3tIVWVYr1mmMlGy74SDTI1whoJpbFhFBqtpKppzVqtETkuLnZ7V8G_r_NLfO7XweWTHCOMmoZQkk14Z5LBxxi04atglyJsOYL8K0j-HST_CzJD5ztoHpMPvwSFtIa4arJ-s9OtMz4sxYcPC8WT2C58MEE4aSMn_-z_BButhBs</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Izzo, G. Martin</creator><creator>Langford, Barry E.</creator><creator>Vitell, Scott</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>M.E. Sharpe, Inc</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Investigating the Efficacy of Interactive Ethics Education: A Difference in Pedagogical Emphasis</title><author>Izzo, G. Martin ; Langford, Barry E. ; Vitell, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b452d0bc95c33384b04d6d5be525c8ecb6a81f712e1ade2f540fedcd74759ee13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Descriptive ethics</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethical instruction</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Interactive learning</topic><topic>Kohlbergs stages of moral development</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Moral development</topic><topic>Moral education</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Izzo, G. Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langford, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitell, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Izzo, G. Martin</au><au>Langford, Barry E.</au><au>Vitell, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the Efficacy of Interactive Ethics Education: A Difference in Pedagogical Emphasis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing theory and practice</jtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>239-248</pages><issn>1069-6679</issn><eissn>1944-7175</eissn><abstract>This study employs an experimental design to investigate the efficacy of a new approach to ethics training- "interactive" ethics education. After random assignment to groups of 135 real estate licensees from four different firms, the treatment group received specialized, interactive ethics instruction, while the control group did not. The two groups were tested in terms of both their general level of cognitive moral development using Rest's defining issues test (DIT) and their industry-specific level of moral development using the real estate survey (RES). Although a pretest indicated that there was no significant difference in levels of cognitive moral development between the control and treatment groups, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of both DIT and RES after the completion of the interactive training session.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.2753/MTP1069-6679140305</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-6679 |
ispartof | Journal of marketing theory and practice, 2006-06, Vol.14 (3), p.239-248 |
issn | 1069-6679 1944-7175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212188343 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Business ethics Cognition & reasoning Cognitive style Control groups Decision making Descriptive ethics Design Education Ethical instruction Ethics Experiments Interactive learning Kohlbergs stages of moral development Marketing Moral development Moral education Morality Pedagogy Real estate Real estate sales Social ethics Students Training Values |
title | Investigating the Efficacy of Interactive Ethics Education: A Difference in Pedagogical Emphasis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T14%3A46%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Interactive%20Ethics%20Education:%20A%20Difference%20in%20Pedagogical%20Emphasis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Izzo,%20G.%20Martin&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=239-248&rft.issn=1069-6679&rft.eissn=1944-7175&rft_id=info:doi/10.2753/MTP1069-6679140305&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40470268%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212188343&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40470268&rfr_iscdi=true |