Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes
•A novel uncoupled damage model is proposed based on positive triaxiality rate.•Damage effect on tandem and sequential two-pass drawn wires is analyzed.•An experimental model validation is performed.•Safe-unsafe predictable limits are numerically obtained and assessed.•Triaxiality evolution at wire...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering fracture mechanics 2018-09, Vol.200, p.375-386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 386 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 375 |
container_title | Engineering fracture mechanics |
container_volume | 200 |
creator | González, Álvaro A. Cruchaga, Marcela A. Celentano, Diego J. |
description | •A novel uncoupled damage model is proposed based on positive triaxiality rate.•Damage effect on tandem and sequential two-pass drawn wires is analyzed.•An experimental model validation is performed.•Safe-unsafe predictable limits are numerically obtained and assessed.•Triaxiality evolution at wire center is the main difference between both configurations.
Multipass wire drawing can be made by passing the wire through consecutive dies (tandem configuration) or through dies apart from each other (sequential configuration). In this work, both configurations are simulated with the purpose of determining the effect of die spacing on the development of fractures in two-pass drawn wires subjected to different area reductions. To achieve this, an uncoupled ductile fracture criterion that considers the evolution of damage under conditions of increasing effective plastic deformation and triaxiality occurring in the material is applied and assessed in its ability to predict the beginning of fracture under the two analyzed configurations.
The comparison between tandem and sequential configurations allows the extension of the fracture model used in previous work in order to account for the evolution of damage not only under positive triaxiality values but also and simultaneously for positive triaxiality rates during the entire drawing sequence. This new model reproduces in a good way the differences in the damage evolution between both configurations and also allows to explain the reason why the tandem configuration is more unsafe than the sequential one. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2121674271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013794418305460</els_id><sourcerecordid>2121674271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37165559bc3d92dbc410a9693b2142cfb2f3834d4717f168b22d90094a721b6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwHYo4d9hp2rRHNPFnEhIX4Bqlibul2tqRdJv49qQbB45IlmzpvWfLP8ZuEWYIWNy3M-qWjddmQ2Y144DlDGKhOGMTLGWWygzzczYBwDhXQlyyqxBaAJBFCRP2ueiMs9QZSvomsY6SsNXGdcvEdcmwooT2_Xo3uL476nqjl3SUDn261SEkB-cpsV4fxszW94ZCoHDNLhq9DnTz26fs4-nxff6Svr49L-YPr6kRAEOaSSzyPK9qk9mK29oIBF0VVVZzFNw0NW-yMhNWSJQNFmXNua0AKqElx7qgbMruTnvj5a8dhUG1_c538aTiyLGQgkuMrurkMr4PwVOjtt5ttP9WCGrEqFr1B6MaMSqIhSJm56csxTf2jrwKxo28bHzcDMr27h9bfgB5RoBv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121674271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>González, Álvaro A. ; Cruchaga, Marcela A. ; Celentano, Diego J.</creator><creatorcontrib>González, Álvaro A. ; Cruchaga, Marcela A. ; Celentano, Diego J.</creatorcontrib><description>•A novel uncoupled damage model is proposed based on positive triaxiality rate.•Damage effect on tandem and sequential two-pass drawn wires is analyzed.•An experimental model validation is performed.•Safe-unsafe predictable limits are numerically obtained and assessed.•Triaxiality evolution at wire center is the main difference between both configurations.
Multipass wire drawing can be made by passing the wire through consecutive dies (tandem configuration) or through dies apart from each other (sequential configuration). In this work, both configurations are simulated with the purpose of determining the effect of die spacing on the development of fractures in two-pass drawn wires subjected to different area reductions. To achieve this, an uncoupled ductile fracture criterion that considers the evolution of damage under conditions of increasing effective plastic deformation and triaxiality occurring in the material is applied and assessed in its ability to predict the beginning of fracture under the two analyzed configurations.
The comparison between tandem and sequential configurations allows the extension of the fracture model used in previous work in order to account for the evolution of damage not only under positive triaxiality values but also and simultaneously for positive triaxiality rates during the entire drawing sequence. This new model reproduces in a good way the differences in the damage evolution between both configurations and also allows to explain the reason why the tandem configuration is more unsafe than the sequential one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-7944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Axial stress ; Comparative analysis ; Computer simulation ; Damage ; Deformation effects ; Deformation mechanisms ; Differences ; Ductile fracture ; Evolution ; Fractures ; Multipass wire drawing ; Plastic deformation ; Simulation ; Tandem configuration ; Triaxiality ; Wire drawing</subject><ispartof>Engineering fracture mechanics, 2018-09, Vol.200, p.375-386</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37165559bc3d92dbc410a9693b2142cfb2f3834d4717f168b22d90094a721b6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37165559bc3d92dbc410a9693b2142cfb2f3834d4717f168b22d90094a721b6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794418305460$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>González, Álvaro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruchaga, Marcela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celentano, Diego J.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes</title><title>Engineering fracture mechanics</title><description>•A novel uncoupled damage model is proposed based on positive triaxiality rate.•Damage effect on tandem and sequential two-pass drawn wires is analyzed.•An experimental model validation is performed.•Safe-unsafe predictable limits are numerically obtained and assessed.•Triaxiality evolution at wire center is the main difference between both configurations.
Multipass wire drawing can be made by passing the wire through consecutive dies (tandem configuration) or through dies apart from each other (sequential configuration). In this work, both configurations are simulated with the purpose of determining the effect of die spacing on the development of fractures in two-pass drawn wires subjected to different area reductions. To achieve this, an uncoupled ductile fracture criterion that considers the evolution of damage under conditions of increasing effective plastic deformation and triaxiality occurring in the material is applied and assessed in its ability to predict the beginning of fracture under the two analyzed configurations.
The comparison between tandem and sequential configurations allows the extension of the fracture model used in previous work in order to account for the evolution of damage not only under positive triaxiality values but also and simultaneously for positive triaxiality rates during the entire drawing sequence. This new model reproduces in a good way the differences in the damage evolution between both configurations and also allows to explain the reason why the tandem configuration is more unsafe than the sequential one.</description><subject>Axial stress</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Deformation effects</subject><subject>Deformation mechanisms</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>Ductile fracture</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Multipass wire drawing</subject><subject>Plastic deformation</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Tandem configuration</subject><subject>Triaxiality</subject><subject>Wire drawing</subject><issn>0013-7944</issn><issn>1873-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwHYo4d9hp2rRHNPFnEhIX4Bqlibul2tqRdJv49qQbB45IlmzpvWfLP8ZuEWYIWNy3M-qWjddmQ2Y144DlDGKhOGMTLGWWygzzczYBwDhXQlyyqxBaAJBFCRP2ueiMs9QZSvomsY6SsNXGdcvEdcmwooT2_Xo3uL476nqjl3SUDn261SEkB-cpsV4fxszW94ZCoHDNLhq9DnTz26fs4-nxff6Svr49L-YPr6kRAEOaSSzyPK9qk9mK29oIBF0VVVZzFNw0NW-yMhNWSJQNFmXNua0AKqElx7qgbMruTnvj5a8dhUG1_c538aTiyLGQgkuMrurkMr4PwVOjtt5ttP9WCGrEqFr1B6MaMSqIhSJm56csxTf2jrwKxo28bHzcDMr27h9bfgB5RoBv</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>González, Álvaro A.</creator><creator>Cruchaga, Marcela A.</creator><creator>Celentano, Diego J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes</title><author>González, Álvaro A. ; Cruchaga, Marcela A. ; Celentano, Diego J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37165559bc3d92dbc410a9693b2142cfb2f3834d4717f168b22d90094a721b6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Axial stress</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Deformation effects</topic><topic>Deformation mechanisms</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>Ductile fracture</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Multipass wire drawing</topic><topic>Plastic deformation</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Tandem configuration</topic><topic>Triaxiality</topic><topic>Wire drawing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González, Álvaro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruchaga, Marcela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celentano, Diego J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering fracture mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González, Álvaro A.</au><au>Cruchaga, Marcela A.</au><au>Celentano, Diego J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes</atitle><jtitle>Engineering fracture mechanics</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>200</volume><spage>375</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>375-386</pages><issn>0013-7944</issn><eissn>1873-7315</eissn><abstract>•A novel uncoupled damage model is proposed based on positive triaxiality rate.•Damage effect on tandem and sequential two-pass drawn wires is analyzed.•An experimental model validation is performed.•Safe-unsafe predictable limits are numerically obtained and assessed.•Triaxiality evolution at wire center is the main difference between both configurations.
Multipass wire drawing can be made by passing the wire through consecutive dies (tandem configuration) or through dies apart from each other (sequential configuration). In this work, both configurations are simulated with the purpose of determining the effect of die spacing on the development of fractures in two-pass drawn wires subjected to different area reductions. To achieve this, an uncoupled ductile fracture criterion that considers the evolution of damage under conditions of increasing effective plastic deformation and triaxiality occurring in the material is applied and assessed in its ability to predict the beginning of fracture under the two analyzed configurations.
The comparison between tandem and sequential configurations allows the extension of the fracture model used in previous work in order to account for the evolution of damage not only under positive triaxiality values but also and simultaneously for positive triaxiality rates during the entire drawing sequence. This new model reproduces in a good way the differences in the damage evolution between both configurations and also allows to explain the reason why the tandem configuration is more unsafe than the sequential one.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.014</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-7944 |
ispartof | Engineering fracture mechanics, 2018-09, Vol.200, p.375-386 |
issn | 0013-7944 1873-7315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2121674271 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Axial stress Comparative analysis Computer simulation Damage Deformation effects Deformation mechanisms Differences Ductile fracture Evolution Fractures Multipass wire drawing Plastic deformation Simulation Tandem configuration Triaxiality Wire drawing |
title | Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A10%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20die%20spacing%20in%20the%20evolution%20of%20damage%20in%20two-pass%20wire%20drawing%20processes&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20fracture%20mechanics&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez,%20%C3%81lvaro%20A.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=200&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=375-386&rft.issn=0013-7944&rft.eissn=1873-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2121674271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121674271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0013794418305460&rfr_iscdi=true |