Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes

•A novel uncoupled damage model is proposed based on positive triaxiality rate.•Damage effect on tandem and sequential two-pass drawn wires is analyzed.•An experimental model validation is performed.•Safe-unsafe predictable limits are numerically obtained and assessed.•Triaxiality evolution at wire...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering fracture mechanics 2018-09, Vol.200, p.375-386
Hauptverfasser: González, Álvaro A., Cruchaga, Marcela A., Celentano, Diego J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A novel uncoupled damage model is proposed based on positive triaxiality rate.•Damage effect on tandem and sequential two-pass drawn wires is analyzed.•An experimental model validation is performed.•Safe-unsafe predictable limits are numerically obtained and assessed.•Triaxiality evolution at wire center is the main difference between both configurations. Multipass wire drawing can be made by passing the wire through consecutive dies (tandem configuration) or through dies apart from each other (sequential configuration). In this work, both configurations are simulated with the purpose of determining the effect of die spacing on the development of fractures in two-pass drawn wires subjected to different area reductions. To achieve this, an uncoupled ductile fracture criterion that considers the evolution of damage under conditions of increasing effective plastic deformation and triaxiality occurring in the material is applied and assessed in its ability to predict the beginning of fracture under the two analyzed configurations. The comparison between tandem and sequential configurations allows the extension of the fracture model used in previous work in order to account for the evolution of damage not only under positive triaxiality values but also and simultaneously for positive triaxiality rates during the entire drawing sequence. This new model reproduces in a good way the differences in the damage evolution between both configurations and also allows to explain the reason why the tandem configuration is more unsafe than the sequential one.
ISSN:0013-7944
1873-7315
DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.014