Defense of Tests Prevents Objective Consideration of Validity and Fairness/Responses to Issues Raised About Validity, Bias, and Fairness in High-Stakes Testing

Helms comments on the study of Sackett, Borneman, and Connelly by stating that the The authors erroneously interpreted standardized mean differences in CAKS test scores between Black and White test takers, for example, as if they were validity evidence, but they are not unless the intended purpose o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American psychologist 2009-05, Vol.64 (4), p.283
Hauptverfasser: Helms, Janet E, Sackett, Paul R, Borneman, Matthew J, Connelly, Brian S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Helms comments on the study of Sackett, Borneman, and Connelly by stating that the The authors erroneously interpreted standardized mean differences in CAKS test scores between Black and White test takers, for example, as if they were validity evidence, but they are not unless the intended purpose of tests is to disadvantage Blacks relative to Whites.
ISSN:0003-066X
1935-990X