Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
In a multinational, randomized study, pembrolizumab produced significantly improved progression-free and overall survival and less high-grade toxicity than did ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Two therapeutic strategies have improved survival for patients with advanced melanoma in re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2015-06, Vol.372 (26), p.2521-2532 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In a multinational, randomized study, pembrolizumab produced significantly improved progression-free and overall survival and less high-grade toxicity than did ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Two therapeutic strategies have improved survival for patients with advanced melanoma in recent years: immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies blocking BRAF and MEK.
1
BRAF and MEK inhibitors are indicated for the approximately 40 to 50% of patients with
BRAF
V600 mutations,
1
whereas immunotherapies are effective independently of
BRAF
mutational status.
2
Ipilimumab, which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), a coinhibitory molecule of the immune system,
3
,
4
is approved for treating advanced melanoma on the basis of its survival benefit.
5
,
6
However, grade 3 or 4 adverse events, mostly immune-related,
7
are observed in 23% of patients.
5
,
6
When activated . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093 |