Scattering Calculations for Asymmetric Raindrops during a Line Convection Event: Comparison with Radar Measurements

Two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) data from a line convection rain event are analyzed using the method of moments surface integral equation (MoM-SIE) via drop-by-drop polarimetric scattering calculations at C band that are compared with radar measurements. Drop geometry of asymmetric drop sha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology 2018-06, Vol.35 (6), p.1169-1180
Hauptverfasser: Manić, Sanja B., Thurai, Merhala, Bringi, V. N., Notaroš, Branislav M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) data from a line convection rain event are analyzed using the method of moments surface integral equation (MoM-SIE) via drop-by-drop polarimetric scattering calculations at C band that are compared with radar measurements. Drop geometry of asymmetric drop shapes is reconstructed from 2DVD measurements, and the MoM-SIE model is created by meshing the surface of the drop. The differential reflectivity Z dr calculations for an example asymmetric drop are validated against an industry standard code solution at C band, and the azimuthal dependence of results is documented. Using the MoM-SIE analysis on 2DVD drop-by-drop data (also referred to as simply MoM-SIE), the radar variables [ Z h , Z dr , K dp , ρ hv ] are computed as a function of time (with 1-min resolution) and compared to C-band radar measurements. The importance of shape variability of asymmetric drops is demonstrated by comparing with the traditional (or “bulk”) method, which uses 1-min averaged drop size distributions and equilibrium oblate shapes. This was especially pronounced for ρ hv , where the MoM-SIE method showed lowered values (dip) during the passage of the line convection consistent with radar measurements, unlike the bulk method. The MoM-SIE calculations of [ Z h , Z dr , K dp ] agree very well with the radar measurements, whereas linear depolarization ratio (LDR) calculations from the drop-by-drop method are found to be larger than the values from the bulk method, which is consistent with the dip in simulated and radar-measured ρ hv . Our calculations show the importance of the variance of shapes resulting from asymmetric drops in the calculation of ρ hv and LDR.
ISSN:0739-0572
1520-0426
DOI:10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0196.1