The Effect of Aliased and De-aliased Formulation for DNS Analysis in Plane Poiseuille Flow

In this research, the performance of various aliased and de-aliased schemes was studied in pseudo-spectral (PS) simulation. The PS method was used to perform aliased and de-aliased direct numerical simulation of a turbulent plane Poiseuille channel flow. The effects of aliasing errors in Navier–Stok...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Iranian journal of science and technology. Transactions of civil engineering 2017-03, Vol.41 (1), p.77-85
Hauptverfasser: Rajabi, Elham, Kavianpour, Mohammad Reza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this research, the performance of various aliased and de-aliased schemes was studied in pseudo-spectral (PS) simulation. The PS method was used to perform aliased and de-aliased direct numerical simulation of a turbulent plane Poiseuille channel flow. The effects of aliasing errors in Navier–Stokes equations were examined for both common skew-symmetric and rotational forms. Due to boundary conditions, Fourier series in periodic directions and Chebyshev expansion in normal direction were considered. A third-order backward difference scheme was used for temporal approximation method, and different types of “2/3 rule” de-aliasing procedures in various directions were examined. The results for aliased and de-aliased formulation showed that generally, the skew-symmetric form gives the most accurate results. But de-aliased rotational form was more robust and presented fewer errors. The amount of aliasing errors for the ordinary rotation form is about two times larger than for De-aliased XYZ rotational scheme and common skew-symmetric form. From a practical point of view, the choice between the skew-symmetric form and de-aliased rotational method with the same accuracy reduces to the last one if final decision rests on the amount of computational time.
ISSN:2228-6160
2364-1843
DOI:10.1007/s40996-016-0032-1