Cost-Effectiveness of Ponatinib in The Treatment of Patients With Chronic Phase- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Greece

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ponatinib compared to bosu-tinib, allogeneic stem cell transplantation(allo-SCT) and hydroxycarbamide as treatment of adult patients with Chronic Phase -Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) who failed prior therapy with dasatinib or nilotinib for reason...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2017-10, Vol.20 (9), p.A435
Hauptverfasser: Gourzoulidis, G, Kourlaba, G, Giannoulia, P, Panagiotidis, P, Maniadakis, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ponatinib compared to bosu-tinib, allogeneic stem cell transplantation(allo-SCT) and hydroxycarbamide as treatment of adult patients with Chronic Phase -Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) who failed prior therapy with dasatinib or nilotinib for reasons of resistance/intolerance to, and for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not clinically appropriate, or who have the T315I mutation in the Greek healthcare setting. METHODS: A markov model with three-month cycle was locally adapted from a third-party payer perspective to reflect the natural progression of patients with CP-CML through different health states over a life-time horizon (50-years). The clinical inputs as well as utility values were extracted from relevant clinical trials and published studies. Resource consumption data of CP-CML patients were obtained from local experts and the relevant unit costs from local resources(in €2017). Primary outcomes were patient quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY gained. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted to account for uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: The analysis showed that ponatinib was associated with 4.21,4.09 and 5.99 increment in QALYs compared with bosutinib, allo-SCT, and hydroxycarbamide, respectively, at additional cost of €160,679, €74,482 and €180,014, respectively. The corresponding ICERs were €38,161, €18,226 and €30,050 per QALY gained versus bosutinib, allo-SCT, and hydroxycarbamide, respectively. At the predefined willingness to pay threshold of €51,000 per QALY gained (3 times of Greek GDP, based on WHO), PSA estimated that treatment with ponatinib had a probability of 80% to be a cost-effective option compared to bosutinib and 94% compared to allo-SCT and hydroxycarbamide. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that ponatinib provides substantial clinical benefit as compared with current treatment alternatives at a reasonable cost. Hence, ponatinib may represent a cost-effective treatment option for patients with CP-CML in Greece.
ISSN:1098-3015
1524-4733
DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.212