AVIAN COMMUNITIES OF CREATED AND NATURAL WETLANDS: BOTTOMLAND FORESTS IN VIRGINIA

The federal government requires those who destroy wetlands to preserve, restore, or create new ones with the goal of no net loss of wetlands. In the summer of 2000, we tested whether forested wetlands created an average of 8 years earlier had developed avian communities similar to natural wetlands o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 2003-05, Vol.105 (2), p.303-315
Hauptverfasser: Snell-Rood, Emilie C, Cristol, Daniel A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The federal government requires those who destroy wetlands to preserve, restore, or create new ones with the goal of no net loss of wetlands. In the summer of 2000, we tested whether forested wetlands created an average of 8 years earlier had developed avian communities similar to natural wetlands of the same age in southeastern Virginia. We compared six created wetlands to five natural (reference) wetlands that had undergone ecological succession after clearcutting. We also created a trajectory of expected avian community development by comparing 20 reference wetlands, logged 1–25 years earlier, to mature forested wetlands that had not been logged for 50 years or more. Created wetlands had significantly lower avian richness and diversity, and a different community composition, than reference wetlands. These differences were likely due to the fact that created wetlands supported low numbers of the expected passerine species. In addition, natural wetlands supported species of higher conservation concern, as measured by Neotropical migratory status, trophic level, habitat specificity, and wetland dependency. The trajectory of avian community development indicated that the created wetlands were developmentally behind reference wetlands or were following a different developmental trajectory altogether. We hypothesize that the differences between created and reference forested wetlands were due to unnatural patterns of hydrology or retarded vegetation development on created wetlands. It should not be assumed that created forested wetlands can provide full ecosystem replacement for natural forested wetlands. Comunidades de Aves en Humedales Artificiales y Naturales: Bosques Ribereños en Virginia Resumen. El gobierno federal requiere que tras destruir humedales, aquellos que lo hacen preserven, restauren o creen nuevos humedales con el objetivo de que no haya una pérdida neta de éstos. En el verano de 2000, probamos si los humedales arbolados creados en promedio 8 años atrás habían desarrollado comunidades de aves similares a las de humedales naturales de la misma edad en Virginia suroriental. Comparamos seis humedales artificiales con cinco naturales (de referencia) que habían sufrido sucesión ecológica luego de talas rasas. También creamos una trayectoria esperada del desarrollo de las comunidades de aves comparando 20 humedales de referencia donde se taló entre 1 y 25 años atrás, con humedales arbolados maduros que no habían sufrido talas por 50 años o más. La
ISSN:0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
DOI:10.1650/0010-5422(2003)105[0303:ACOCAN]2.0.CO;2