Hierarchies, clans, and theory Z: A new perspective on organization development
The notion that industrial organizations must, of necessity, be structured as bureaucratic hierarchies is challenged. There are at least 2 other ways to organize people into a cooperative effort: 1. markets, in which price becomes the controlling influence, and 2. clans, in which cooperation results...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organizational dynamics 1993-03, Vol.21 (4), p.62-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The notion that industrial organizations must, of necessity, be structured as bureaucratic hierarchies is challenged. There are at least 2 other ways to organize people into a cooperative effort: 1. markets, in which price becomes the controlling influence, and 2. clans, in which cooperation results from commonly shared values. The latter concept gives rise to "Type Z organizations." Companies that exhibit Type Z characteristics include Kodak, Proctor & Gamble, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Cummins Engine Co. Type Z organizations have managed to stop the rapid movement and turnover that apparently characterizes many other industrial organizations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-2616 1873-3530 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0090-2616(93)90034-X |