Flexor digitorum profundus tendon-to-bone repair: An ex vivo biomechanical analysis of 3 pullout suture techniques
Avulsions or distal transsections of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon are typically repaired by direct suture of tendon to the distal phalanx. The tensile properties of tendon-to-bone repairs performed in cadaver fingers using 3 common suture patterns, the Bunnell, the Kessler, and the Kleinert...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 1998, Vol.23 (1), p.120-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Avulsions or distal transsections of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon are typically repaired by direct suture of tendon to the distal phalanx. The tensile properties of tendon-to-bone repairs performed in cadaver fingers using 3 common suture patterns, the Bunnell, the Kessler, and the Kleinert techniques, were compared; 3–0 Prolene (monofilament) suture was used. Repairs done using the Kessler pattern had an average yield force of 30 N, compared to 39 N for the Bunnell and Kleinert patterns. Although these average yield forces were greater than that required for active digital flexion, considerable elongation (average, 8 mm) was measured at a force of 20 N. Data indicated that the safety factor achieved with these repair methods is lower than that achieved with modern tendon-to-tendon repair methods. The authors conclude that the common tendon-to-bone repair techniques are insufficient to withstand the higher forces associated with controlled passive and active motion rehabilitation methods that are currently advocated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5023 1531-6564 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80099-3 |