United States v. Rohm and Haas Company: Under CERCLA, Government Cannot Collect Expenses for Overseeing Private Party Cleanups

United States v. Rohm and Haas Company: Under CERCLA, Government Cannot Collect Expenses for Overseeing Private Party Cleanups

A study examines whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted section 107 of CERCLA consistent with congressional intent when it ruled in "US vs Rohm and Haas Co" that the costs the EPA incurred to monitor and oversee a private party's hazardous waste cleanup were not recove...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural resources journal 1995-07, Vol.35 (3), p.711-726
1. Verfasser: Wee, Elizabeth M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Administrative expenses
CASENOTE
CERCLA 1980-US
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
Cost recovery
Costs
Court costs
Court decisions
Environmental agencies
Environmental cleanup
Government
Hazardous waste
Hazardous waste sites
Litigation
Monitoring costs
Political parties
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A study examines whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted section 107 of CERCLA consistent with congressional intent when it ruled in "US vs Rohm and Haas Co" that the costs the EPA incurred to monitor and oversee a private party's hazardous waste cleanup were not recoverable.
ISSN:0028-0739
2640-2149