An Auto-Calibrated Sense Amplifier with Offset Prediction Approach for Energy-Efficient SRAM
In this paper, for the first time, a novel offset suppression technique is proposed to tackle the offset issue. The key idea is to improve bit error rate (BER) with an energy-efficient offset prediction-based sense amplifier (OPB-SA) for static random access memory (SRAM). The OPB-SA effectively com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circuits, systems, and signal processing systems, and signal processing, 2019-04, Vol.38 (4), p.1482-1505 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, for the first time, a novel offset suppression technique is proposed to tackle the offset issue. The key idea is to improve bit error rate (BER) with an energy-efficient offset prediction-based sense amplifier (OPB-SA) for static random access memory (SRAM). The OPB-SA effectively compensates for the branch current mismatch due to threshold voltage (
V
TH
) offset in SA sensing devices. Extensive simulation results, referring to an industrial hardware-calibrated UMC 65-nm CMOS technology, show that OPB-SA achieves 27.2, 20 and 11.1% offset reduction over current latch SA (CLSA), SA with inherent offset cancellation (SAOC) and offset-compensated current SA (OCCSA), respectively, without sacrificing performance. The OPB-SA features significant offset suppression capabilities with 31.3, 12.2 and 7% tighter offset distribution compared to CLSA, SAOC and OCCSA, respectively. The energy efficiency is 0.26fJ/bit, thus improving 61.04, 84.16 and 87.12% over SAOC, OCCSA and body bias SA (BBSA), respectively. The OPB-SA requires 0.72 ×, 0.8 × and 0.88 × less bit-line swings than CLSA, SAOC and OCCSA for targeted 0% BER. Hence, overall SRAM macro with proposed scheme exhibits a superior dynamic power metric over the conventional designs with 0.66 ×, 0.74 ×, 0.98 × and 0.81 × lower bit-line power consumption than CLSA, SAOC, OCCSA and BBSA, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-081X 1531-5878 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00034-018-0934-1 |