Towards Fine Grained Network Flow Prediction

One main challenge for the design of networks is that traffic load is not generally known in advance. This makes it hard to adequately devote resources such as to best prevent or mitigate bottlenecks. While several authors have shown how to predict traffic in a coarse grained manner by aggregating f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2018-08
Hauptverfasser: Jahnke, Patrick, Stapf, Emmanuel, Mieseler, Jonas, Neumann, Gerhard, Eugster, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One main challenge for the design of networks is that traffic load is not generally known in advance. This makes it hard to adequately devote resources such as to best prevent or mitigate bottlenecks. While several authors have shown how to predict traffic in a coarse grained manner by aggregating flows, fine grained prediction of traffic at the level of individual flows, including bursty traffic, is widely considered to be impossible. This paper shows, to the best of our knowledge, the first approach to fine grained per flow traffic prediction. In short, we introduce the Frequency-based Kernel Kalman Filter (FKKF), which predicts individual flows' behavior based on measurements. Our FKKF relies on the well known Kalman Filter in combination with a kernel to support the prediction of non linear functions. Furthermore we change the operating space from time to frequency space. In this space, into which we transform the input data via a Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT), the peak structures of flows can be predicted after gleaning their key characteristics, with a Principal Component Analysis (PCA), from past and ongoing flows that stem from the same socket-to-socket connection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on popular benchmark traces from a university data center. Our approach predicts traffic on average across 17 out of 20 groups of flows with an average prediction error of 6.43% around 0.49 (average) seconds in advance, whilst existing coarse grained approaches exhibit prediction errors of 77% at best.
ISSN:2331-8422