Optimal design and operating strategies for a biomass-fueled combined heat and power system with energy storage

An economic linear programming model with a sliding time window was developed to assess designing and scheduling a biomass-fueled combined heat and power system consisting of biomass gasifier, internal combustion engine, heat recovery set, heat-only boiler, producer gas storage and thermal energy st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy (Oxford) 2018-07, Vol.155, p.620-629
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Yingying, Jenkins, Bryan M., Kornbluth, Kurt, Kendall, Alissa, Træholt, Chresten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An economic linear programming model with a sliding time window was developed to assess designing and scheduling a biomass-fueled combined heat and power system consisting of biomass gasifier, internal combustion engine, heat recovery set, heat-only boiler, producer gas storage and thermal energy storage. A case study was examined for a conceptual utility grid-connected BCHP application in Davis, California under different scenarios. The results show that a 100 kW biomass gasifier and engine combination with energy storage was the most cost effective design based on the assumed energy load profile, utility tariff structure and technical and finical performance of the system components. Engine partial load performance was taken into consideration. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate how the optimal BCHP configuration changes with varying demands and utility tariff rates. •A model was developed to optimize the design of a biomass-fueled combined heat and power with energy storage.•Receding horizon optimization was applied to dispatch of the BCHP components to achieve minimum cost.•The model application provides a means to determine optimal BCHP configuration with varying demands and utility tariff rates.
ISSN:0360-5442
1873-6785
DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.036