Ranking Graduate Programs Based on Research Productivity of Faculty: A Replication and Extension

In an analysis of publication rates in applied behavior analysis, Dixon, Reed, Smith, Belisle, and Jackson (2015a) argued the need to measure the research productivity of graduate programs as a means of informing prospective graduate students. The current study replicated and extended Dixon, et al....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Education & treatment of children 2018-08, Vol.41 (3), p.299-318
Hauptverfasser:	Blair, Bryan J., Shawler, Lesley A., Debacher, Emily A., Harper, Jill M., Dorsey, Michael F.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Achievement Rating Analysis Applied Behavior Analysis Author productivity Behavior Behavior Patterns Behaviorism Behaviorism (Psychology) Behaviourism Bibliometrics Citation Analysis College Faculty Comparative Analysis Enrollment Rate Evaluation Methods Evidence Based Practice Graduate students Graduate Study Graduate work Graduation Rate Institutional Characteristics Law Enforcement Measurement Techniques Medical research Periodicals Productivity Program Evaluation Psychological Patterns Quality Replication (Evaluation) Research Needs Researchers Science Science publishing Scientists Scientometrics Special Issue on the Scientist-Practitioner Model in Applied Behavior Analysis Teacher Researchers Training Universities and colleges Verbal Stimuli
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	In an analysis of publication rates in applied behavior analysis, Dixon, Reed, Smith, Belisle, and Jackson (2015a) argued the need to measure the research productivity of graduate programs as a means of informing prospective graduate students. The current study replicated and extended Dixon, et al. (2015a) by analyzing the number of publications and citations. The results suggest that there is a discrepancy between rankings by publication and by citation, and further analysis is required. We also recommend further areas of inquiry in the analysis of research productivity.
ISSN:	0748-8491 1934-8924 1934-8924
DOI:	10.1353/etc.2018.0015