To Centralize or Not to Centralize: A Tale of Swarm Coordination

Large swarms of autonomous devices are increasing in size and importance. When it comes to controlling the devices of large-scale swarms there are two main lines of thought. Centralized control, where all decisions - and often compute - happen in a centralized back-end cloud system, and distributed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2018-05
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Justin, Bruno, Ariana, Zagieboylo, Drew, Zhao, Mark, Ritchken, Brian, Jackson, Brendon, Chae, Joo Yeon, Mertil, Francois, Espinosa, Mateo, Delimitrou, Christina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Large swarms of autonomous devices are increasing in size and importance. When it comes to controlling the devices of large-scale swarms there are two main lines of thought. Centralized control, where all decisions - and often compute - happen in a centralized back-end cloud system, and distributed control, where edge devices are responsible for selecting and executing tasks with minimal or zero help from a centralized entity. In this work we aim to quantify the trade-offs between the two approaches with respect to task assignment quality, latency, and reliability. We do so first on a local swarm of 12 programmable drones with a 10-server cluster as the backend cloud, and then using a validated simulator to study the tail at scale effects of swarm coordination control. We conclude that although centralized control almost always outperforms distributed in the quality of its decisions, it faces significant scalability limitations, and we provide a list of system challenges that need to be addressed for centralized control to scale.
ISSN:2331-8422