Experimental investigation of thermal performance of parallel connected vortex tubes with various nozzle materials
•The ratio of (L/D) is 14 and two vortex tubes are connected as parallel.•Cold outlet temperature is minimum with nozzle material aluminum.•Aluminum is the most effective nozzle material at nozzle number of six in this case.•Thermal behavior of vortex tube strongly dependent on nozzle material.•The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied thermal engineering 2018-05, Vol.136, p.287-292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The ratio of (L/D) is 14 and two vortex tubes are connected as parallel.•Cold outlet temperature is minimum with nozzle material aluminum.•Aluminum is the most effective nozzle material at nozzle number of six in this case.•Thermal behavior of vortex tube strongly dependent on nozzle material.•The maximum uncertainties of ΔT, Pi and ṁ are 1.92%, 1.51% and 2.82% respectively.
This paper is about experimental investigation for thermal performance of two identical parallel connected counter flow Ranque-Hilsch vortex tubes by using different orifice nozzle numbers and nozzle materials and also compressed air as a working fluid. The effects of nozzle numbers and materials on thermal performance by applying compressed air at the inlet at different pressures were experimentally determined. Experimental analyses were carried out by using polyamide plastic, aluminum and brass as nozzle materials with inlet pressure range 150–550 kPa with 50 kPa increment. Orifices having 2, 4 and 6 nozzle numbers were used in the vortex tubes. The length – diameter ratios (L/D) of the vortex tubes are 14 and the cold mass fractions are 0.36. The results of experimental studies revealed that the maximum performance was obtained with aluminum nozzles with nozzle number 6 at 550 kPa inlet pressure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-4311 1873-5606 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.105 |