Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis – Authors' reply
In our reanalysis, we clarified definitions of the sample size used, including only those patients from each study with culture-confirmed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who had started a second-line drug regimen. In the paper by Munsiff and colleagues,1 only 610 of 856 patients were treated with s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2010-04, Vol.10 (4), p.215-216 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In our reanalysis, we clarified definitions of the sample size used, including only those patients from each study with culture-confirmed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who had started a second-line drug regimen. In the paper by Munsiff and colleagues,1 only 610 of 856 patients were treated with second-line drugs. [...]our recorded prevalence of HIV of 58% was on the basis of only the 352 patients infected with HIV from this smaller sample. Randomised clinical trials comparing programmatic and treatment regimen differences for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis are needed and would provide a stronger evidence base for improving treatment outcomes in this population. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70046-3 |