0216 The Effect Of Caffeine On Glucose Metabolism, Self-reported Hunger And Mood State During Extended Wakefulness

Abstract Introduction Caffeine is a stimulant often taken to reduce sleepiness and improve cognitive performance. The effect of caffeine on glucose metabolism during sleep deprivation is less well understood. This double-blind laboratory study examined the impact of caffeine on glucose metabolism, s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2018-04, Vol.41 (suppl_1), p.A84-A85
Hauptverfasser: Grant, C L, Coates, A M, Dorrian, J, Paech, G M, Pajcin, M, Della Vedova, C, Johnson, K, Kamimori, G H, Fidock, J, Aidman, E, Banks, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Caffeine is a stimulant often taken to reduce sleepiness and improve cognitive performance. The effect of caffeine on glucose metabolism during sleep deprivation is less well understood. This double-blind laboratory study examined the impact of caffeine on glucose metabolism, self-reported hunger and mood state during 50h of wakefulness. Methods Participants were assigned to caffeine (n=9, 6M, age 21.3 ± 2.1y; BMI 21.9 ± 1.6kg/m2) or placebo conditions (n=8, 4M, age 23.0 ± 2.8y; BMI 21.8 ± 1.6kg/m2). Following a baseline sleep opportunity from 22:00h-08:00h, participants commenced 50h of extended wake. Caffeine (200mg) or placebo gum was administered at 01:00h, 03:00h, 05:00h and 07:00h during each night of extended wake. Continual glucose monitoring was used to capture interstitial glucose 2h post-breakfast, from which area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Hunger and mood state were assessed at 10:00h, 16:30h, 22:30h and 04:30h. Results A significant rise in glucose AUC, in response to breakfast, was seen following the second night of extended wakefulness (p=0.003, ɳ2partial=0.32, large effect). Caffeine did not alter the glucose response, with no difference shown between conditions (p=0.680, ɳ2partial=0.01, small effect). Participants reported significant (p
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.215