Power and Recognition: How (Super)Powers Decide the International Recognition Process

The article offers a modified theoretical approach toward the issue of secession and international recognition. Based on the novel political theory of secession as presented by Milena Sterio and the measurement of external involvement in secessionist attempts as researched by Alexis Heraclides, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Politics & policy (Statesboro, Ga.) Ga.), 2018-06, Vol.46 (3), p.442-471
Hauptverfasser: RIEGL, MARTIN, DOBOŠ, BOHUMIL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The article offers a modified theoretical approach toward the issue of secession and international recognition. Based on the novel political theory of secession as presented by Milena Sterio and the measurement of external involvement in secessionist attempts as researched by Alexis Heraclides, the article provides a theoretical model of modified (super)power rule. The article, based on preliminary conclusions from an internal dataset of secessionist attempts between 1946 and 2016 containing 63 items, argues that effective (super)power support is a sufficient condition for the de facto independence of any secessionist entity. The model is tested on cases of Somaliland, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, Kosovo, and Transnistria. Related Articles Antwi‐Boateng, Osman, and Geraldine Maria O'Mahony. 2008. “A Framework for the Analysis of Peace Agreements and Lessons Learned: The Case of the Sudanese Comprehensive Peace Agreement.” Politics & Policy 36 (1): 132‐178. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00097.x Haar, Roberta. 2015. “When Does the United States Intervene Militarily for Humanitarian Reasons?” Politics & Policy 43 (2): 287‐314. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/polp.12111 Peralta, Salvador J. 2013. “Do Culture and Institutions Matter? Explaining the Sources of Cross‐National Regime Support.” Politics & Policy 41 (4): 479‐508. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/polp.12024 Related Media Messer, Mackie. 2015. “The Coconut Revolution.” http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2x5eul Rickerd, Kurt. 2014. “Katanga, the Untold Story (of UN Betrayal).” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvgBvwfW5Dw XBN. 2015. “Transnistria: Places that Don't Exist.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiioOj85X9E Vice News. 2014. “The Sahara's Forgotten War.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju4WrjiJbGc Resumen Este artículo presenta un enfoque teórico modificado hacia el asunto de secesión y la reconocimiento internacional. En base de la teoría política nueva de la secesión como presentado por Milena Sterio, y usando la medida del involucramiento externa en los intentos secesionistas como investigado por Alexis Heraclides, el artículo provee un modelo teórico del “modified (super)power rule.” Basado en las conclusiones preliminares desde un conjunto de datos interno de los intentos secesionistas entre 1946 y 2016 que contiene 63 artículos, argumentamos que el apoyo eficaz de un país (súper)poder es un condición suficiente para la indepe
ISSN:1555-5623
1747-1346
DOI:10.1111/polp.12257