Reproduced multi-domain regions during demagnetization in Nd^sub 2^Fe^sub 14^B sintered magnets with different average grain sizes

We prepared five Nd2Fe14B sintered magnets with similar saturation polarizations (Js) of 1.38–1.43 T and anisotropy fields (Ha) of 6.76–8.52 T, but different grain sizes (DAV) of 3.1–8.4 μm in diameter and obviously different coercivities (μ0Hc) of 0.8–1.6 T. The observed difference in coercivity co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials 2018-04, Vol.451, p.493
Hauptverfasser: Kobayashi, Kurima, Nimura, You-ta, Urushibata, Kimiko, Hayakawa, Kazuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We prepared five Nd2Fe14B sintered magnets with similar saturation polarizations (Js) of 1.38–1.43 T and anisotropy fields (Ha) of 6.76–8.52 T, but different grain sizes (DAV) of 3.1–8.4 μm in diameter and obviously different coercivities (μ0Hc) of 0.8–1.6 T. The observed difference in coercivity could not be explained by the Kronmüller equation, because of the similar Ha values and similar chemical compositions and microstructures resulting from similar preparation method except DAV. The Hc values themselves, however, are inversely proportional to DAV. During demagnetization after magnetization in a 5 T pulse field, domain wall motion (DWM) was observed except in the sample with μ0Hc = 1.6 T by using our step method. The DWM was also confirmed by susceptibility measurements using a custom-built vibrating sample magnetometer, and DWM was generated in the reproduced multi-domain regions (RMDR) during demagnetization. The magnitude of DWM as a polarization change in the RMDR was inversely proportional to the coercivities of the samples. Therefore, it should be considered that the propagation of the nucleated region through the grain boundary, which corresponds to the expansion process in previous studies, was different caused by, first, the difference in DAV, and, second, in grain boundary state which was varied by difference in final annealing temperature.
ISSN:0304-8853
1873-4766