Reduced‐dose direct oral anticoagulants in the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Essentials In venous thromboembolism (VTE), benefits of extended treatment are balanced by bleeding risks. This is a meta‐analysis of reduced‐dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in extended treatment. Reduced‐dose DOACs are as effective as full anticoagulation with bleeding risks similar to plac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2018-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1288-1295
Hauptverfasser: Vasanthamohan, L., Boonyawat, K., Chai‐Adisaksopha, C., Crowther, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Essentials In venous thromboembolism (VTE), benefits of extended treatment are balanced by bleeding risks. This is a meta‐analysis of reduced‐dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in extended treatment. Reduced‐dose DOACs are as effective as full anticoagulation with bleeding risks similar to placebo. Reduced‐dose DOACs are an attractive option for patients in the extended phase of VTE treatment. Summary Background Extended‐duration anticoagulation is beneficial for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Reduced‐dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be preferable if they preserve efficacy and cause less bleeding. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of trials comparing reduced‐dose DOACs with full‐dose DOACs and aspirin or placebo in the extended phase of VTE treatment. Methods A literature search was conducted by use of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, supplemented by hand‐searching. One thousand three hundred and ninety‐nine titles were screened, with data from accepted studies being extracted by two independent reviewers. Major outcomes analyzed included recurrent VTE and major and clinically relevant non‐major bleeding events, presented as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Two trials met the prespecified inclusion criteria. Data from 5847 patients were analyzed for efficacy outcomes, and from 5842 patients for safety outcomes. Reduced‐dose DOACs were as effective as full‐dose treatment in preventing recurrent VTE at 1 year (RR 1.12 [95% CI 0.67–1.87]), and more effective than aspirin or placebo (RR 0.26 [95% CI 0.14–0.46]). Rates of major or clinically relevant non‐major bleeding events were similar between patients receiving reduced‐dose DOACs and and those receiving aspirin or placebo (RR 1.19 [95% CI 0.81–1.77]). There was a trend towards less bleeding when reduced‐dose and full‐dose DOACs were compared (RR 0.74 [95% CI 0.52–1.05]). Conclusions Extended‐duration treatment of VTE with reduced‐dose DOACs may be as efficacious as full‐dose treatment, with rates of major bleeding being similar to those in patients receiving treatment with aspirin or placebo, but further long‐term studies are needed.
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/jth.14156