Polymorphisms in predator induced defences of coexisting Daphnia pulex and D. longispina

A comparison of juvenile predator-avoidance polymorphisms of Daphnia pulex and D. longispina in a shallow water body of Northern Italy is reported. The presence of the Chaoborus larvae resulted in juvenile adaptive predator-avoidance cyclomorphosis in both species. The frequency of induced morphotyp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2018-11, Vol.823 (1), p.121-133
Hauptverfasser: Maurone, Catia, Suppa, Antonio, Rossi, Valeria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A comparison of juvenile predator-avoidance polymorphisms of Daphnia pulex and D. longispina in a shallow water body of Northern Italy is reported. The presence of the Chaoborus larvae resulted in juvenile adaptive predator-avoidance cyclomorphosis in both species. The frequency of induced morphotypes was higher in the small-sized D. longispina than in the large-sized D. pulex. Relative tail-spine size was higher in D. longispina than in D. pulex. D. longispina displayed much more responsiveness to Chaoborus than D. pulex . Both species showed at least 6 different defensive morphotypes that were classified according to the neckteeth number, the neckteeth position and the thickness of occipital epithelia under neckteeth. The frequencies of different morphotypes varied significantly between species. The developmental responses of Daphnia to the presence of predators are regulated at various levels, according to specific timelines of kairomone sensitive phases and developmental frame of defense trait formation. Variation of a specific timeline might be linked to flexibility in developmental responses of Daphnia to Chaoborus and seasonal variation in the frequencies of various morphotypes. Cyclomorphosis should not only be due to changes in environmental factors that directly affects risk, but also to ones that act as proxy signaling changes in predation risk.
ISSN:0018-8158
1573-5117
DOI:10.1007/s10750-018-3701-1