DIETARY QUALITY AND FOOD PROCESSING LEVELS IN SUBSTANTIAL OUT-OF-HOME EATERS AND NON-SUBSTANTIAL OUT-OF- HOME EATERS

Background and objectives: Consumption of convenient ready-prepared foods and eating out-of-home has raised in low- and middle income countries. Eating out-of-home has been associated with unhealthy dietary patterns rich in processed and ultra-processed foods. The aim of this study is to compare the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of nutrition and metabolism 2017-10, Vol.71 (Suppl. 2), p.833
Hauptverfasser: García, Ana Angélica García, Carpio, Gabriela Alexandra Zúñiga, Jimbo, Diana Paola Córdova, Jimbo, Patricia Liliana Ramírez, Argudo, Diana Alexandra Morillo, Muñoz, Diana Jesús Andrade, Moscoso, Silvana Patricia Donoso, Tenesaca, Dolores Susana Andrade, Avilés, Angelica Ochoa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and objectives: Consumption of convenient ready-prepared foods and eating out-of-home has raised in low- and middle income countries. Eating out-of-home has been associated with unhealthy dietary patterns rich in processed and ultra-processed foods. The aim of this study is to compare the dietary quality and foods processing levels between Substantial out-of-home (SOH) and Non-substantial out-of-home (NSOH) eaters. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 779 adolescents from an urban and a rural area in Ecuador (2008- 2009). Two non-consecutive 24-hour recalls were used to estimate dietary intake; eating out-of home was defined when food items were prepared in any place different than: the student home and relative's or friends home. Participants were classified as SOH eaters if they obtained more than 25% of their daily energy intake out-of-home; meanwhile, those who obtained ≤25% of daily energy intake out-of-home were identified as NSOH. Food processing levels were categorized using the NOVA Brazilian classification into non-processed, culinary ingredients, processed and ultra- processed foods. Two sample t-test was used to compare mean daily energy intake, energy density and macronutrient energy %, as well as energy % intake by food processing levels between SOH and NSOH eaters. Results: Overall, 71.89% of participants were classified as SOH eaters. Total energy intake (1927 kcal vs. 1825 kcal; p = 0.01), energy density (1.82 kcal/g vs. 1.62 kcal/g; p = 0.00) and total fat % 24.7% vs. 22.1%; p = 0.00) intakes were higher among SOH eaters compared with NSOH eaters. In addition, SOH eaters obtained less energy from non-processed food (48.4% vs. 60.7%; P
ISSN:0250-6807
1421-9697
DOI:10.1159/000480486