AMINO ACID PROFILE OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTIVE LINES OF CHICKEN, TURKEY AND PORK MEAT
Background and objectives: The nutritional composition of meat has variated through time due to industrialization of production systems, genetic improvement and lean carcasses design experienced by domestic animals. Objective: Compare the amino acid (AA) composition of cuts of chicken, turkey and po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of nutrition and metabolism 2017-10, Vol.71 (Suppl. 2), p.1067 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and objectives: The nutritional composition of meat has variated through time due to industrialization of production systems, genetic improvement and lean carcasses design experienced by domestic animals. Objective: Compare the amino acid (AA) composition of cuts of chicken, turkey and pork meat with standards utilized for the evaluation of AA of the Chilean diet. Methods: The samples of chicken cuts (wings, breast, thigh, leg, liver and gizzard), turkey (whole, breast, thigh and leg) and pork (veiled chop, ribs, fillet, leg, shoulder, bacon-loin and heart), were given by the company Agrosuper and selected by the investigators. The samples where homogenized and freezed at -20°C before the analysis. A T-Test was performed to estimate the difference between AA analysis and AA composition referred by the FAO 1981. Results: Chicken thigh had less concentration for all AA (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0250-6807 1421-9697 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000480486 |