Balancing the Needs to Assess Depth and Breadth of Knowledge: Does Essay Choice Provide a Solution?
Teaching and assessment of student learning are not unrelated activities. Rather, assessment is an integral part of the learning process. Teaching is how instructors help students to discover knowledge and new ideas and ways of organizing and perceiving what they have learned. Assessment of learning...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of legal studies education 2005-03, Vol.22 (2), p.103-122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Teaching and assessment of student learning are not unrelated activities. Rather, assessment is an integral part of the learning process. Teaching is how instructors help students to discover knowledge and new ideas and ways of organizing and perceiving what they have learned. Assessment of learning incorporates the broad array of techniques that can capture what a student knows about what was taught. Just as there is no "best" teaching method, neither is there only one "best" approach to student assessment. Tests, however, are generally the primary and sometimes the only method for assessing learning. This article begins with an overview of the relevant aspects of the research of Benjamin Bloom and other educational psychologists on the levels of intellectual competencies important to learning and the test question cues related to these competencies. The article then describes legal environment of business exams where students can choose both which essays to answer and how many to answer, thereby self-determining the mix between objective questions (true-false and multiple choice) and essay questions. The results of a student questionnaire as well as data analysis of student point scores are also examined. The article concludes with observations on the benefits of offering students essay choice. (Contains 1 figure, 17 footnotes and 5 tables.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0896-5811 1744-1722 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1744-1722.2005.00014.x |