Models of Administrative Action
Various models of administrative action, concentrating particularly on the standard bipolar model, are examined. Analysis shows that most of the models, which employ a single axis between 2 extremes, are difficult to apply to real-world decisions. Critics of the bipolar model imply that its 2 differ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Virginia law review 1986-03, Vol.72 (2), p.363-398 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Various models of administrative action, concentrating particularly on the standard bipolar model, are examined. Analysis shows that most of the models, which employ a single axis between 2 extremes, are difficult to apply to real-world decisions. Critics of the bipolar model imply that its 2 different axes of concern are not perfectly congruent, but they have not identified the 2 distinct axes of concern that animate the model, and an improved model should encompass both. A simple 2-axis approach may be a helpful starting point. It reduces each set of concerns to a binary proposition and, unlike the bipolar model, separates the 2 binary propositions, political-apolitical and incremental-comprehensive, to create a 4-box matrix with 4 possible processes. This approach makes the remaining steps to a better model easier. These steps include: 1. elaborating the normative propositions that should govern selection among the 4 paradigm processes in any given instance, and 2. explicating the procedural mechanisms that should be associated with each paradigm. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-6601 1942-9967 |
DOI: | 10.2307/1073062 |